"In my opinion, the conduct of our client is completely harmless to society and significantly minor in nature."
The two prosecutors exchanged glances.
But they were unable to directly answer this question.
They could only diverge from the main topic of the debate and said gravely, "The defendant's behavior clearly constitutes a crime under criminal law."
"Your claim that he was unaware that Fei's parakeet is an endangered and protected wild animal does not hold up to logic."
"Being able to grow the number of parakeets from two to eighteen within five years, he must have a comprehensive and profound understanding of the parakeets, and cannot be exonerated on the grounds of ignorance."
"During those five years, he had ample time to cease his criminal activities and hand over the parakeets to the forestry department."
"But instead..."
