The presiding judge and the judges were quite at ease with this case.
The facts of this case were laid out clearly.
The crimes committed by these four individuals had already been thoroughly investigated by the state.
Now it was merely a matter of how to sentence these individuals.
Although the presiding judge of the first trial spoke of imposing severe punishment, seeing the four individuals show signs of remorse and actively bearing all the losses by handing over tens of millions, eventually led to a more lenient sentence.
The lenient punishment resulted in a life sentence.
Who could have thought that these individuals would appeal!
Moreover, from the attitude of these four in the second trial, there was no sense of remorse, rather a sense of dissatisfaction with the verdict.
Given this, he could only conduct official business as required.
Moreover, the defense lawyer for these four made a reasonable argument.
The circumstances were egregious!
