Chapter 15: Leonard's Investigation
POV: Leonard
Leonard Hofstadter sat alone in his Caltech laboratory at 11:47 PM, surrounded by empty coffee cups and the blue glow of multiple computer monitors displaying what could only be described as an obsession made manifest in spreadsheet form.
For the past three weeks, ever since discovering "The Bloom Prophet" blog, Leonard had been conducting what he told himself was objective scientific analysis of his friend's impossible success rate. But sitting here in the fluorescent-lit silence, documenting pattern after pattern that violated every statistical model he could construct, he had to admit the truth: he was investigating Stuart Bloom like a suspicious phenomenon rather than trusting him like a friend.
The data was undeniable and terrifying in its implications.
Column A: Prediction dates, meticulously cross-referenced with Leonard's own text message history and social media posts.
Column B: Stuart's specific claims, quoted as precisely as Leonard could remember them.
Column C: Actual outcomes, verified through news articles and market data.
Column D: Probability calculations that made Leonard's physicist brain rebel against their own conclusions.
Bitcoin mention: October 15th, 2007. Stuart's claim: "Might be worth watching, could really take off." Actual performance: 340% gain by December 31st. Probability of prediction success: 0.02%.
Walking Dead speculation: September 30th, 2007. Stuart's claim: "This is going to be huge when the TV show gets announced." Actual outcome: AMC option announced November 20th, comic value tripled. Probability: 0.008%.
Writers' strike prediction: October 8th, 2007. Stuart's claim: "Writers might strike soon, starting early November." Actual outcome: Strike began November 5th, exactly as predicted. Probability: 0.001%.
iPhone success forecast: March 12th, 2007. Stuart's claim: "Apple's phone will change everything." Actual outcome: Revolutionary market disruption, Apple stock gains exceeding 300%. Probability: 0.15%.
The cumulative probability of Stuart achieving this level of accuracy across unrelated domains through legitimate research and intuition was approximately one in 847 million.
"Those are lottery-winning odds," Leonard thought, staring at the numbers that refused to make sense no matter how many times he recalculated them. "Except Stuart isn't playing one lottery—he's winning multiple lotteries in completely different categories, month after month."
Leonard leaned back in his chair, rubbing his tired eyes and trying to construct rational explanations for data that seemed to defy rationality itself. He'd tested every hypothesis he could think of:
Insider trading network: Stuart had no connections to relevant industries, no background in finance, no history of sophisticated market analysis.
Superior analytical capabilities: Comic shop owners weren't typically trained in macroeconomic forecasting, entertainment industry dynamics, and emerging technology assessment.
Lucky guessing: The probability calculations eliminated this possibility beyond any reasonable doubt.
Access to proprietary information: No evidence of unusual computer usage, suspicious communications, or lifestyle changes that would suggest intelligence gathering activities.
"Which leaves what?" Leonard wondered, staring at his computer screen like it might reveal some explanation he'd overlooked. "Time travel? Precognition? Some kind of supernatural intervention that violates everything I understand about how reality works?"
The scientist in him rejected those possibilities as absurd. The friend in him didn't want to believe that Stuart was involved in anything illegal or deceptive. But the data analyst in him couldn't ignore patterns that pointed toward conclusions that challenged his fundamental assumptions about what was possible.
"There has to be a rational explanation," Leonard told himself, saving his analysis to an encrypted file. "People don't just suddenly develop prophetic abilities. Stuart's hiding something, but it's probably something explainable—maybe embarrassing, maybe complicated, but not supernatural."
Tomorrow, he would confront Stuart directly. Not with accusations or demands, but with honest questions that deserved honest answers. If their friendship was built on genuine trust, it should be able to survive a conversation about impossible patterns and statistical anomalies.
"And if it can't survive that conversation," Leonard thought grimly, "then maybe I never really knew Stuart Bloom at all."
The next afternoon, Leonard walked into The Comic Center of Pasadena carrying his laptop and a printout of his analysis, his heart hammering with the kind of nervous energy that usually preceded important scientific presentations. The shop was busy with its usual afternoon crowd, but Leonard waited patiently until the customers thinned out before approaching the counter where Stuart was organizing new inventory.
"Hey Leonard," Stuart said with the genuine warmth that made this conversation so difficult to contemplate. "What brings you by? Besides the usual comic fix."
"Actually," Leonard said, setting his laptop on the counter, "I wanted to talk to you about something. Something... analytical."
Stuart's expression shifted subtly, his smile becoming more guarded. "Analytical how?"
Leonard opened his laptop and turned it toward Stuart, revealing the comprehensive spreadsheet he'd constructed. "I've been documenting your predictions over the past six months. The success rate, the specificity, the probability calculations. I need you to help me understand how this is possible."
Stuart stared at the screen for a long moment, his face cycling through emotions Leonard couldn't quite read. When he looked up, his expression was carefully neutral.
"That's... thorough," Stuart said quietly.
"Stuart, the cumulative probability of achieving this accuracy rate through normal means is less than one in eight hundred million. Either you're the luckiest person in human history, or you have access to information that you're not telling us about."
"Here it comes," Leonard thought, watching his friend's micro-expressions for signs of deception or panic. "Either he explains the impossible, or I learn that I don't really know him at all."
But before Stuart could respond, a customer approached the counter—a middle-aged man with his teenage daughter, both clearly excited about something they'd found in the graphic novel section.
"Excuse me," the man said, "my daughter's birthday is next week, and she's just getting into comics. Could you recommend something that might be perfect for a smart fifteen-year-old who loves strong female characters?"
Leonard watched Stuart's entire demeanor shift as he turned to help the customer. The guarded tension melted away, replaced by genuine enthusiasm and care.
"Absolutely," Stuart said, coming around the counter to join them in the browsing area. "Has she read Ms. Marvel yet? The Kamala Khan series? It's about a Pakistani-American teenager who gets superpowers and has to navigate being a hero while dealing with typical high school problems."
For the next ten minutes, Leonard observed Stuart in his natural element—asking thoughtful questions about the daughter's interests, making recommendations that were clearly chosen for her specifically rather than pushing high-value items, sharing stories about other customers who'd discovered new favorite series through similar recommendations. The interaction was authentic, generous, and completely devoid of the calculating behavior Leonard might expect from someone running an elaborate deception.
"This is who Stuart really is," Leonard realized, watching the man and his daughter leave with a carefully curated stack of comics and genuine excitement about reading them. "Whatever explanation exists for his impossible success, he's not some kind of cold manipulator or criminal mastermind. He's just... Stuart. The person who genuinely cares about matching people with stories they'll love."
When they were alone again, Stuart returned to the counter and closed Leonard's laptop without looking at the screen.
"Leonard," he said carefully, "I understand why the patterns seem impossible. I've been asking myself the same questions. But the honest answer is that I read everything—trade publications, industry blogs, financial newsletters, technology forums. I spend probably sixty hours a week absorbing information about pop culture and market trends. I notice patterns that other people miss because I'm completely obsessed with this stuff."
"He's lying," Leonard thought, watching Stuart's face as he delivered the explanation. "Not maliciously, not to hurt anyone, but he's definitely not telling the complete truth."
"I also get lucky," Stuart continued. "Really, really lucky. More than anyone has a right to expect. But luck and pattern recognition can create results that look impossible from the outside."
The explanation was reasonable, well-delivered, and completely insufficient to account for the data Leonard had compiled. But sitting here in Stuart's shop, watching him interact with customers who clearly trusted and valued his recommendations, Leonard found himself facing a choice that went beyond statistical analysis.
He could press harder, demand more specific explanations, refuse to accept answers that didn't satisfy his scientific skepticism. Or he could choose to trust his friend, even when that friend was clearly holding back important information.
"Some mysteries," Leonard thought, "might be more important than the relationships they affect. And some relationships might be worth preserving even when they can't include complete transparency."
"Okay," Leonard said finally.
"Okay?"
"Okay, I accept that explanation. Extraordinary pattern recognition plus exceptional luck. It's statistically improbable, but not technically impossible."
Stuart's relief was visible, though it was mixed with something that looked like guilt. "Leonard, I—"
"You don't owe me detailed explanations about your business instincts," Leonard interrupted. "I was just curious about the statistical improbability. But you're right—sometimes smart people get lucky, and lucky people appear smart. The correlation is probably more interesting than the causation."
They stood in comfortable silence for a moment, both understanding that something had shifted between them without being entirely sure what.
POV Shift: Stuart
That evening, Leonard returned to my shop just as I was closing, carrying two controllers and a stack of video games.
"I thought," he said, "we could play some games. Like normal friends do, without analyzing each other's probability distributions."
"That sounds great," I said, grateful for the olive branch he was extending.
We spent the next two hours playing cooperative missions in various games, trash-talking each other's strategies, and generally acting like the friends we'd been before statistical analysis had complicated our relationship. But I could feel the weight of Leonard's unasked questions and my unshared answers creating a subtle distance that hadn't existed before.
"This is the cost of keeping cosmic secrets," I realized as we completed another level together. "Not just the isolation of carrying impossible knowledge, but the guilt of lying to people who deserve better from me."
"Stuart," Leonard said during a loading screen, "can I tell you something?"
"Of course."
"I ran those calculations because your success rate genuinely troubled my understanding of how probability works. But after thinking about it, I realized something important."
"What's that?"
"Arthur C. Clarke once wrote that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. I think the same principle applies to expertise. Any sufficiently analyzed luck is indistinguishable from skill."
Leonard paused the game and turned to face me directly. "Maybe you're just really, really good at synthesis and pattern recognition in ways that appear magical to people who aren't as deeply immersed in the relevant information streams. Maybe what looks impossible to outsiders is actually the predictable result of focused attention and genuine expertise."
"He's giving me a way out," I realized. "Creating a framework that explains my impossible accuracy without requiring supernatural intervention or deceptive behavior. He's choosing to believe the best possible interpretation of the evidence."
"I've been thinking the same thing," I said, which was partially true. "Sometimes when you spend enough time studying something, you develop instincts that seem magical but are really just pattern recognition happening below the conscious level."
"Exactly," Leonard agreed. "And maybe I was overthinking the statistical analysis. Outliers exist in every distribution. Someone has to be the person whose results look impossible to everyone else."
We resumed playing, but I found myself studying Leonard's profile as he focused on the screen. He was choosing friendship over skepticism, trust over investigation, even though his scientific mind clearly wasn't satisfied with the explanations I'd provided.
"This is what real friendship looks like," I thought, watching him help my character through a particularly difficult section. "Not demanding complete transparency, but choosing to believe in someone's character even when their circumstances don't make perfect sense."
Leonard was giving me the gift of assumed innocence, even though he knew something didn't add up. He was protecting our relationship by choosing not to pursue questions that might damage it irreparably.
"I don't deserve this level of trust," I realized, feeling the familiar weight of guilt that came with every deception, no matter how necessary. "But maybe the best way to honor it is to live up to the person he's choosing to believe I am."
The void had given me incredible powers, but Leonard Hofstadter had given me something equally valuable—proof that genuine friendship could survive impossible secrets, as long as the foundation was built on mutual respect rather than complete honesty.
"Some truths are too big to share," I thought as we played late into the evening. "But some relationships are strong enough to carry the weight of unshared truths, if the people involved care more about each other than about having all the answers."
Tomorrow, I would continue the delicate balancing act of being helpful without being impossible, successful without being supernatural. But tonight, I allowed myself to feel grateful for a friend who'd chosen trust over truth, and hopeful that maybe I could build a life worthy of the faith he was placing in me.
Note:
Please give good reviews and power stones itrings more people and more people means more chapters?
My Patreon is all about exploring 'What If' timelines, and you can get instant access to chapters far ahead of the public release.
Choose your journey:
Timeline Viewer ($5): Get 10 chapters of early access + 5 new chapters weekly.
Timeline Explorer ($8): Jump 15-20 chapters ahead of everyone.
Timeline Keeper ($15): Get Instant Access to chapters the moment I finish writing them. No more waiting.
Read the raw, unfiltered story as it unfolds. Your support makes this possible!
👉 Find it all at patreon.com/Whatif0