[Zane & Partners, Midtown — December 7, 2012, 3:22 PM]
The two associates registered before Zane did.
They were in the chairs flanking the conference table when I was shown in — both young, both with legal pads, both with the particular alert-neutral posture of people told to be present but not to participate unless asked. Their presence was information. Robert Zane did not bring witnesses to private conversations. He brought witnesses to professional transactions he wanted documented in someone else's memory.
The offer was also a test.
Zane stood from his chair at the head of the table when I came in, which was a small gesture of respect and also a way of establishing the room's geometry before we started. He was around fifty-five, solid in the way of men who had tried cases for thirty years and had developed a courtroom posture that never entirely left, with the kind of warmth that came from choosing which principles to operate on and having made that choice long enough that it had stopped feeling like choosing.
"Don." He extended his hand. "Thank you for coming over."
"Of course."
The handshake was unremarkable. I did not suppress the absorption — I had stopped suppressing Zane's handshakes two years ago when I had determined he was not a person I was studying strategically. The brief contact gave me: professional, resolved, a specific quality of attention that said he had already made a decision before I arrived and this meeting was about confirming it, not reaching it.
We sat.
The associates had their pens ready and their expressions calibrated to neutral-professional. They were not going to learn anything specific here, but they would remember having been present, which was the point of them.
Zane folded his hands on the table.
"There's a pharmaceutical defense case that the court notices flagged last week," he said. "Veridion Cardiac Patch. Class action. The defense bench went to a firm that will run the standard play." He paused, not dramatically. "Word is Klein Legal declined the engagement."
"We were approached," I said.
"And declined."
"And declined."
He looked at me for a moment with the look of a man measuring something. Detection ran the assessment: he was not building to a trap. He was confirming a read he had already made.
"A firm that declines fees it's positioned to earn," he said, "is either poorly run or operating on something other than financial optimization." He tilted his head slightly. "I've watched Klein Legal's practice for two years. I don't believe it's poorly run."
I held his look.
"We take the cases we can take well," I said.
It was the only sentence required. Both of us had said what we meant and neither of us had said anything specific, and the understanding was clean and complete.
Zane looked at the two associates.
"Thank you," he said. "I'll follow up on the Marchetti brief by Monday."
They gathered their legal pads and left. The door closed without drama.
The room was quieter. A different quality of quiet — the kind that follows when people who were performing neutrality have left and the people remaining can stop performing it.
He poured water from the pitcher on the table. I converted $200 and authorized 2 LP before he started speaking — basic modeling, Zane's professional history and known positions, anything the Library could give me about what was coming.
What came back was: Robert Zane — co-counsel alliance precedent (see Ch.23 vulnerability list analysis — Robert Zane noted as potential network ally, not yet developed). Offer structure probability: resource-sharing, referral-priority, no subordination. Motivating condition: Don Klein's Sacrifice identified as character confirmation event.
The Library was confirming what I had already read from the room.
"I've been watching your practice for two years," Zane said. "The Graystone case against Harvey. The antitrust positioning with the bar association. The London bottle work. You have built something specific." He picked up the water glass. "And you have just done something that costs more than most practitioners would pay."
"The case was not defensible."
"I know." He said it simply. "I don't need confirmation of what you did. I need to know if it's consistent."
"I don't take cases I can't run well."
"That's the strategic version." He looked at me. "I have my own version of that story. I chose principle over profit once, in a case that cost me a partner and a third of my client base. I would do it again. The question I'm asking is whether what you did last month is who you are or whether it was a situation."
I thought about Carol Brant's twelve lines. I thought about the empty desk afterward and the espresso I had made for the first time in fourteen months of keeping the Breville in the office. I thought about the cold coffee I had drunk that morning, still cold, because there was a new matter to look at and the warmth of the coffee was a separate consideration.
"It's consistent," I said.
He nodded. Once, specific, the nod of a man who had been looking for a particular piece of information and had found it.
"Then I want to offer you something," he said. "An informal alliance. Not a merger, not a formal referral agreement, not anything that goes on letterhead. Three items."
He listed them.
The co-counsel network: Zane's regulatory clients would have access to Klein Legal's CFIUS and international arbitration practice. Klein Legal's clients would have Zane's trial practice as co-counsel on complex matters.
The deposition support: Zane's firm maintained a full trial support operation — experienced paralegals, document review resources, exhibit preparation. Klein Legal could access it at cost-sharing rates on significant matters.
The referral priority: when clients at Zane's firm needed boutique regulatory work that Zane's practice didn't cover, Klein Legal would be the first call.
The Library's 2 LP modeling had returned green on all three items: no subordination clause, no exclusivity, no hidden mechanism that transferred origination credit or undermined Klein Legal's client relationships. A peer alliance, offered from the position of a senior practitioner who had recognized something in a junior firm's conduct and had decided to extend a hand.
"I accept," I said.
He extended his hand again. Not a test this time. A confirmation.
The handshake again: resolved, warm, the specific quality of a man who is satisfied with the conclusion he has reached. No absorption on my end — I did not need it and the moment did not require it.
"One thing," I said, as we both stood.
"Yes."
"The Veridion plaintiffs. Their case has the evidence they need." I said it quietly, not to perform the discretion but because the discretion was real. "I want that to be true whether or not anyone connects it to anything."
He looked at me.
"It will be," he said. "A good case argues itself."
We walked out together. The two associates were in the corridor. They noted our emergence and would remember its tone, and the tone was: settled, professional, cordial, nothing exceptional. Which was accurate.
The elevator opened. I rode it down.
The Debt Ladder sat at three by my count. The Sacrifice had cost four. The Zane alliance had returned one rung. The math of the cascade was still running but it was no longer entirely in one direction.
I took a cab south and called Harold's cell.
"Zane has a referral," I said. "Environmental regulatory, state EPA enforcement. I'll have the briefing tomorrow."
"I'll be ready," Harold said.
He would be.
✦ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✦
Read A LOT more chapters for free at unwrittenrealm.com
✦ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✦
TL;DR — Patreon has the chapters ahead.
Silver / $6 / 15 or more chap ahead
Gold / $9 / 20 or more chap ahead
Platinum / $15 / 25 or more chap ahead, no weekly wait
That's it. patreon.com/fanficwriter1
If reviews aren't your thing, no pressure — they do help though.