Chapter 2 — The First Trial
The conference with their client wrapped up in twenty minutes, and by nine sharp, Martin, Harvey, and the landlord — a heavyset man from Queens named Frank Kowalski — were seated at the defendant's table inside Courtroom 4 of the Moynihan Federal Building.
The case was, objectively speaking, a mess.
Frank's tenant — one Derek Pullis, twenty-nine, chronically unemployed, and apparently treating the apartment like a personal hotbox — had been three months behind on rent, running what sounded like a rotating party out of a one-bedroom, and had informed Frank, loudly and creatively, that he had no intention of leaving. Frank had responded by showing up unannounced, exchanging words, and then exchanging fists. Two of them, to be specific.
Pullis had called the cops, filed a report, gotten his split lip photographed, and lawyered up by noon.
Now Frank sat at the defendant's table looking like a man waiting for a guillotine, while Martin arranged his documents with the focused calm of someone who'd already run this trial a dozen times in his head.
"Harvey," Martin said without looking up. "Anything you want to add before we start?"
Harvey Specter was leaned back in his chair, arms crossed, looking like a man who'd wandered into a courtroom by accident and found the whole thing mildly entertaining. His suit — charcoal Donna Karan, pocket square folded with the precision of a surgical instrument — was doing more work than he was.
"I'm your supervisor," Harvey said. "My job is to evaluate your performance, not hold your hand through it. This is your show, rookie. I'm just here to take notes."
Martin shrugged and turned back to his documents.
Frank leaned over and muttered, "He's not going to help at all?"
"He's helping by not helping," Martin said. "Don't worry about Harvey."
Frank did not look reassured. He'd been skeptical from the jump — he'd specifically hired Pearson Hardman because of their reputation, and had nearly had a coronary when they assigned his case to someone who looked like he'd graduated last Tuesday. He'd complained. Harvey had listened politely, then said:
"Want a different attorney? My hourly rate is two thousand dollars. Cash, check, or card."
Frank had sat back down.
Now Martin set aside his pen, turned to face Frank directly, and held up one finger.
"Rule one. You tell the truth in there. All of it, on everything. You don't shade it, you don't soften it, you don't leave anything out. If you hit the guy, you say you hit the guy."
Second finger. "Rule two. No reactions. Not with your face, not with your body, not under your breath. I don't care if opposing counsel says something that makes your blood boil. You sit still, you look calm, and you save every single thing you want to say for the recess."
Thumb. "Rule three. Do not speak unless I tell you to. Not one word. Not even if someone across that table is lying through their teeth about you. You look at me. Got it?"
Frank opened his mouth.
"Those are the rules," Martin said. "Follow them and we walk out of here ahead. Break them and we don't. Simple math. Understood?"
Frank looked at him for a moment, then nodded.
Harvey, watching from his periphery, allowed himself a small, private reassessment of the new associate.
The judge was a sixty-seven-year-old named Clarence Whitfield — a former public defender, twenty-two years on the bench, known in the building for his no-nonsense courtroom and the framed photo of his granddaughter on his desk that every clerk mentioned during orientation.
Martin had spent Tuesday evening learning everything about Judge Whitfield that was publicly available.
"All rise."
The courtroom stood as Whitfield entered, settled into his chair, and opened the case file with the efficiency of a man who'd done this ten thousand times.
"Case number 07-CV-8841. Pullis v. Kowalski. Plaintiff brings claims of unlawful eviction and battery." He reviewed the paperwork, then looked up. "Plaintiff's counsel, any additions to the filing?"
Across the aisle, Pullis's attorney — a pinched, over-caffeinated guy named Renfro from a mid-sized firm in Midtown — shook his head. "No, Your Honor."
Whitfield turned to the defense table. "And counsel for the defendant?"
Martin rose, buttoned his jacket. "No, Your Honor."
The judge gave him a brief, appraising look — noted the posture, noted the composure — and moved on.
"Does either party wish to explore settlement prior to argument?"
Renfro glanced over at Martin. Martin gave the smallest shake of his head. Renfro turned back. "Plaintiff does not, Your Honor."
"Very well. We'll proceed."
Renfro opened for the plaintiff and did a competent job of it. He walked the judge through the police report, the hospital's documentation of Pullis's injuries — a split lip, a bruised cheekbone — and the signed statements both parties had given at the precinct the night of the incident.
The chain of evidence was clean. Martin let it sit.
Ten minutes later, Judge Whitfield set down his reading glasses and looked across the courtroom. "Defendant's counsel. Your response?"
Martin stood, picked up a document, and walked it to the clerk. "Your Honor, I'd like to introduce an exhibit that bears directly on the validity of the lease agreement under which the plaintiff currently occupies my client's property."
Whitfield took the document and began reading. "Go ahead."
"The plaintiff neglected to disclose, at the time of signing his lease, that he had been through a divorce at twenty-four — a divorce in which he was denied custody of his child. The court's finding, which is part of the public record, cited credible evidence of alcohol dependency and a pattern of behavior consistent with domestic violence."
The courtroom was quiet.
"My client," Martin continued, "has two children. Ages seven and nine. They share a wall with the plaintiff's apartment. Had my client been made aware of the plaintiff's history — specifically, findings that he posed a potential danger to children — he would not have entered into this lease. The agreement was made on materially incomplete information. I'm requesting the court declare it void, and order the plaintiff to vacate within a reasonable specified period."
Judge Whitfield looked down at the document. He didn't say anything for a moment.
Over at the plaintiff's table, Renfro had turned to Pullis and was speaking in a very controlled, very low voice. Martin couldn't hear the words, but he could read the energy: why didn't you tell me this.
Pullis's expression was the answer.
Martin handed a second exhibit to the clerk without breaking stride. "I also submit character statements from three of the plaintiff's neighbors in his previous building, as well as a statement from a former coworker. Each describes an incident in which the plaintiff directed verbal aggression toward children — specifically, toward children whose noise he found disruptive. No physical contact was made, but the pattern of behavior is documented and consistent."
It was at this point that Derek Pullis stood up, raised his hand, and said, loudly:
"Objection!"
The courtroom went completely silent.
Every head turned. Judge Whitfield's expression didn't change, exactly, but something behind his eyes shifted in the way that a temperature drops.
Renfro grabbed Pullis by the arm and yanked him back down. "Sit. Down."
"I'm sorry, Your Honor," Renfro said, with the energy of a man trying to apologize for an earthquake. "My client—"
"Plaintiff's counsel will control his client," Whitfield said, with the patience of a man who had none. He picked up his gavel and struck it once. "The plaintiff is fined two hundred dollars for disrupting these proceedings. One more outburst and I'll hold him in contempt." He turned back to Martin without changing his expression. "Continue, counselor."
Martin continued.
The third exhibit was a DUI from 2004 and a sealed assault charge from 2005 that had been pled down to disorderly conduct. On its own, it wouldn't have moved the needle much. Combined with the custody ruling and the neighbor statements, it completed a picture.
A man with a documented history of alcohol-related incidents, a pattern of hostility toward children, and a domestic violence finding — living four feet of drywall away from a seven-year-old and a nine-year-old.
Martin didn't editorialize. He didn't need to. He let Judge Whitfield do the math.
Harvey, watching from the back of the defendant's table, had gone very still. He was no longer performing casual disinterest. He was watching.
He'd thought of four ways to win this case the moment the file hit his desk. None of them were this. He'd have argued the eviction was procedurally botched. He'd have challenged the documentation on the injuries. He'd have gone after the police report. All solid approaches.
Martin had gone straight for the judge's granddaughter.
Not literally — but effectively. He'd found the one angle that made this case not about a landlord who lost his temper, but about a question a judge couldn't afford to answer wrong: what happens if I rule in this man's favor and something happens to those kids?
Harvey made a mental note. The note said: watch this one.
Judge Whitfield delivered his findings forty minutes later.
Frank Kowalski, defendant, was ordered to pay four hundred dollars in compensatory damages to Derek Pullis for the battery — two punches, documented, no getting around it. Frank had hit the man. That part was settled.
The lease agreement was declared void on grounds of material misrepresentation. Derek Pullis had seventy-two hours to vacate the premises.
Pullis was further ordered to pay one thousand seven hundred forty-three dollars in documented property damages — a broken bathroom fixture, a stained carpet, a cracked interior door — and to cover the defendant's attorney fees.
All in, Pullis was leaving the apartment, leaving within three days, and writing a check for somewhere north of five thousand dollars on his way out.
Frank stood up from the defendant's table looking like a man who'd just been told a terminal diagnosis was actually a false alarm. He grabbed Martin's hand and shook it for about fifteen seconds. His kids — both of whom had been sitting in the gallery with Frank's wife — came charging through the bar and hugged Martin around the waist simultaneously, which was the kind of thing that didn't happen very often in a federal courtroom.
"You're incredible," Frank kept saying. "I thought we were done. I thought—"
"You followed the rules," Martin said. "That's why we won. Go celebrate."
He eventually got them moving toward the door, watched them go, then began packing his briefcase.
Behind him, Harvey Specter stood up from his chair, straightened his jacket, and waited.
Martin turned around and found Harvey looking at him with an expression he hadn't seen on the man's face before. It wasn't quite a smile. Harvey Specter didn't really do smiles. It was something more like recognition — the way a chess player looks when the other person across the board makes a move that surprises them.
"So," Martin said. "What's my grade?"
Harvey let the silence sit for exactly one beat.
Then he extended his hand.
"Welcome to Pearson Hardman."
Martin looked at it for a moment, then shook it.
Outside the tall windows of Courtroom 4, Manhattan kept moving. Somewhere across town, he knew, a theoretical physicist was explaining the correct way to order Thai food to a very patient experimental physicist. A new neighbor from Nebraska was probably sitting on the floor of an apartment full of boxes, wondering what she'd gotten herself into.
The story was just getting started. All of it.
Martin picked up his briefcase and followed Harvey Specter out of the courtroom.
[Power Stone Goal: 500 = +1 Chapter]
[Review Goal: 10 = +1 Chapter]
If you liked it, feel free to leave a review.
20+chapters ahead on P1treon Soulforger